CONSTRUCTION OF ALTERNATIVE INSTRUMENT TO MEASURE ACADEMIC PROCRASTINATION

Authors

  • Nabila Nasywa Rasyiidah Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Airlangga
  • Adelia Putri Septiani Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Airlangga
  • Mohammad Farich Al fikri Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Airlangga
  • Betha Novira Dwi Hidayat Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Airlangga
  • Riris Ristiana Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Airlangga
  • Putu Vidyastitha Wiguna Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Airlangga
  • Gabriella Emerelda Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Airlangga
  • Naila Cahayani Putri Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Airlangga
  • Romadoni Kun Annisa Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Airlangga
  • Azizah Ayu Septiani Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Airlangga
  • Wenny Fransiska Tamba Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Airlangga
  • Devina Novaliany Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Airlangga
  • Lailatul Devi Rachmani Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Airlangga
  • Azzanjani Safira Wibowo Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Airlangga
  • Siska Novita Gozaly Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Airlangga
  • Danny Sanjaya Arfensia Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Airlangga
  • Nono Hery Yoenanto Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Airlangga
  • Syifa Kamila

Keywords:

academic procrastination, validity, reliability, psychometric

Abstract

Distance learning during the Covid-19 pandemic emergency has some negative impact on student performance. One of these impacts is the emergence of academic procrastination. Procrastination is the tendency to delay activities that need to be done to achieve the goals. Therefore, an instrument is needed to measure and determine the causes of academic procrastination. In this study, an alternative instrument for measuring student academic procrastination was created refers to Solomon and Rothblum's theory of academic procrastination. Forty items were given to 30 active university students, via an online form. Expert judgment used by researcher to conduct content. Internal consistency to check its reliability measured by using Cronbach’s alpha. The result shows that the instrument  is valid and reliable. However, after testing the reliability, 13 items need to be eliminated so that only 27 items remain. The results obtained from this instrument are categorized into three categories, namely high, medium and low. Thus, the following measuring instrument can be used as an alternative measuring tool in measuring and knowing the causes of academic procrastination in students. Furthermore, this research can be used as a reference for developing academic procrastination instrument more valid and reliable instrument for further research.

References

American Educational Research Association, A. P. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.

Argaheni, N. B. (2020). Sistematik Review: Dampak Perkuliahan Daring Saat Pandemi COVID-19 Terhadap Mahasiswa Indonesia. PLACENTUM: Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan dan Aplikasinya, 8(2), 99-108.

Azwar, S. (1994). Seleksi Aitem dalam Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Buletin Psikologi, 2(2), 26-33.

Azwar, S. (2012). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi Edisi 2. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Febriana, R. (2015). Uji Validitas Konstruk pada Instrumen Pass (Procrastination Assessment Scale For Student) dengan Metode Confirmatory Factor Analysis (Cfa). JP3I, IV(3), 267-277.

Hadi, C. (2011, December 13). http://cholichul-fpsi.web.unair.ac.id/artikel_detail-40669-pengukuran%20kinerja-Norma.html. Retrieved July 7, 2021, from http://web.unair.ac.id/: http://cholichul-fpsi.web.unair.ac.id/artikel_detail-40669-pengukuran%20kinerja-Norma.html

Jones, R. P. (2020). Passion meets procrastination: comparative study of negative sales associate behaviours. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 48(10), 1077-1098.doi:doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-06-2019-0200.

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2020, March 24). https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2020/03/mendikbud-terbitkan-se-tentang-pelaksanaan-pendidikan-dalam-masa-darurat-covid19. Retrieved July 20, 2021, from https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/: https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2020/03/mendikbud-terbitkan-se-tentang-pelaksanaan-pendidikan-dalam-masa-darurat-covid19

Kerlinger, F. N. (1964). Foundations of Behavioral Research. Amerika Serikat: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.

Khoirunnisa, R. N., Jannah, M., Dewi, D. K., & Satin. (2021). Prokrastinasi Akademik Mahasiswa Tingkat Akhir pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19. Jurnal Psikologi Teori dan Terapan, 278-292. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26740/jptt.v11n3.p278-292.

Kristy, D. Z. (2019). Manajemen Waktu, Dukungan Sosial, dan Prokrastinasi Akademik Siswa Kelas XI SMA. IJGC, 8(1), 49-54.

Marcelline, A. T. (2021, February 6). https://www.aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/indonesia-remote-learning-face-hurdles-amid-pandemic/2135711. Retrieved July 20, 2021, from https://www.aa.com.tr/en: https://www.aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/indonesia-remote-learning-face-hurdles-amid-pandemic/2135711

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of Evidence Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Washington: D.C.

Mortazavi, F., Mortazavi, S. S., & Khosrorad , R. (2015). Psychometric Properties of the Procrastination Assessment Scale-Student (PASS) in a Student Sample of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Red Crescent medical journaL, 17(9), 1-8.

Oematan, S. C. (2013). Hubungan Antara Prokrastinasi Akademik dan Prestasi Akadmeik pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Psikologi – Universitas Surabaya. Calyptra: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya, 2(1), 1-7.

Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Academic procrastination and statistics anxiety . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 29(1), 3–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000160384.

Peixoto, E. M., Pallini, A. C., Vallerand, R. C., Rahimi, S., & Silva, M. V. (2021). The role of passion for studies on academic procrastination and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Psychology Education, 877-893. doi:10.1007/s11218-021-0.

Pratama, O. G. (2019). Peran Regulasi Emosi terhadap Prokrastinasi Akademik Siswa. IJGC, 8(2), 119-124.

Risdiantoro, R., Iswinarti, & Hasanati, N. (2016). Hubungan prokrastinasi akademik, stres akademik dan kepuasan hidup mahasiswa. Psychology & Humanity, 19(20), 360–373.

Rothblum, E. D., Solomon, L. J., & Murakami, J. (1986). Affective, cognitive, and behavioral differences between high and low procrastinators. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 387-394. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.33.4.387.

Simamora, R. M., Fretes, D. d., Purba, E. D., & Pasaribu, D. (2020). Practices, Challenges, and Prospects of Online Learning during Covid-19 Pandemic in Higher Education: Lecturer Perspectives. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 1(3), 185-208.

Steel, P., Svartdal, F., Thundiyil, T., & Brothen, T. (2018). Examining Procrastination Across Multiple Goal Stages: A Longitudinal Study of Temporal Motivation Theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(327), 1-16. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00327.

Susanti, R. (2018). Konstruksi Alat Ukur dalam Penelitian Psikologi Islam. Jurnal Middle East and Islamic Studies, 5(1), 98-113.

Svartdal, F., Dahl, T. I., Gamst-Klaussen, T., Koppenborg, M., & Klingsieck, K. B. (2020). How Study Environments Foster Academic Procrastination: Overview and Recommendations. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1-13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.540910.

Ursia, N. R., Siaputra, I. B., & Sutanto, N. (2013). Prokrastinasi Akademik dan Self-Control pada Mahasiswa Skripsi Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Surabaya. Makara Seri Sosial Humaniora,, 17(1), 1-18.

Yuniarti, R. D. (2010). Potensi E-learning Melalui Sistem Kuliah On-line Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran Di Prodi Tata Niaga Jurusan Pendidikan Ekonomi Fpeb-upi. Manajerial: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Sistem Informasi, 9(1), 66-77.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-18

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): International Conference on Health Science

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Nabila Nasywa Rasyiidah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.